Environmental Management Systems, or ‘EMS’ as they are often
termed, are frameworks designed to assist individuals or organisations manage
the way they conduct their operations, generally to reduce their impact on the
environment.
An EMS involves the development of a plan that includes the
issues covered, the targets set, details of the management actions that will be
taken to achieve the targets, along with how performance will be monitored and
evaluated.
Although approaches to developing an EMS have varied greatly
in the past, the development of standardised approaches, such as the ISO 14000
standard, provides a useful base.
However, to be useful an EMS does not have to be ISO accredited. Moreover, as the ISO accreditation systems
only audits the process, not the outcomes, if there is no regulatory standard
that is used as the targets within the EMS, these systems cannot guarantee that
appropriate environmental outcomes will be generated.
The major difference between an EMS and ESD is that the ESD
framework is designed to encompass all aspects and issues of the
management of activities that may affect natural resources. However, an EMS may be developed to only
address a single issue. For example,
within a fishery, some operators may have an EMS that relates to the
appropriate handling of fish to achieve improved quality of fish product
reaching the market.
The aspects related to the overall sustainability of the
fish captured by the fishery are most likely to be covered within a fishery
management plan, administered by a regulatory body. Thus, the use of an EMS is mostly appropriate only for
individuals or organisations, particularly for those aspects that are not
covered by fisheries legislation.
Therefore, having an EMS is
likely to be an important mechanism in achieving the implementation of ESD
principles. However, an EMS is only one
possible method for achieving ESD principles.